For example, the rule we have about “cars should not ever pull out in front of us” is our rule, our rule only, and not anyone else’s rule. Sure, it makes sense; it would be nice if people always displayed courteous and safe driving habits. But the truth is, sometimes people will pull out in front of me. The truth is, sometimes I make mistakes. I am not perfect. Others are not perfect. So how do we avoid the anger? We need to re-frame the irrational rules developed and replace them with rational and true thinking patterns. Learn to recognize rules that cause you trouble. Usually the rules we have adopted start with “I must always” or “I should,” “You must always,” “You should.” For example, “I must be in control of ……” These “must” and “should” statements will need to be re-framed using more rational language. A better way to re-frame is to use statements like, “I’d like for you to….” Or “I’d like to always do this, however, sometimes I might not……..” “I’d like to minimize my mistakes, however, sometimes I’m going to make mistakes, and it’s OK.” “Sometimes I’m not going to in control and it’s OK.” “Sometimes kids are going to mess up the house and it’s OK.” Re-framing is not always easy. These thoughts and rules are often involuntary even after a person resolves not to have them. After all, it took a life time of structuring and framing our individual thinking patterns. Studies show that there are actual physiological pathways mapped according to our thinking patterns. These can only be re-framed and re-structured by practicing “re-thinking” and re-framing using the true and rational thoughts. Sometimes the practice and re-framing requires intense, intentional, efforts. But it can be done. We need to first recognize and observe what our “self-talk” is, step back, and critically look at our thoughts. Are they rooted in truth? Is there evidence to support our thinking? Often, we draw conclusions from situations, events or experiences where there is no evidence to support the conclusion. Learn to judge your thoughts in terms or their rational basis. Are there distortions? This is the hallmark of Aaron Beck’s cognitive behavior therapy model that has been used for years with considerable success marked by many clinical studies. Prayer can also be a key factor in re-framing our thinking. If you have additional questions or concerns about how to re-frame, you can e mail me a rwcreasy@gmail.com
-
Subscribe
Recent Comments
- anonymous on Hermann Hesse
- Steve on After Second Thought…..Yea, I’m Celebrating
- B.J. Jackson on After Second Thought…..Yea, I’m Celebrating
- B.J. Jackson on After Second Thought…..Yea, I’m Celebrating
- Jeremy Crow on After Second Thought…..Yea, I’m Celebrating
Contents
Archives
- May 2011 (1)
- February 2011 (2)
- January 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (1)
- November 2010 (1)
- June 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (1)
- April 2010 (4)
- March 2010 (3)
- February 2010 (3)
- January 2010 (2)
- December 2009 (4)
- November 2009 (6)
- October 2009 (13)
- September 2009 (8)
- August 2009 (13)
- July 2009 (14)
- June 2009 (12)
- May 2009 (12)
- April 2009 (25)
- March 2009 (22)
Categories
Topics
abc addictions bible study cbs cognitive congress debt devotional dreams drugs economy environment epa family feelings finances fox government healthcare human condition inspirational international Iraq marriage media medication models news o'reily obama olberman quotation reform regret rush limbaugh Self-Talk sexlife Spiritual theories therapy thought life truth video war warfareAffiliations
Ethereal.network
Meta
Post a Comment